MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791493023 · doi:10.6018/j/324151

Développer des compétences pour favoriser la connaissance du passé dans les programmes d’études: le cas de l’enseignement de l’histoire dans l’enseignement secondaire au Québec

2018· article· es· W2791493023 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marc–André Éthier, Jean–François Cardin, David Lefrançois

Bibliographic record

VenueEducatio Siglo XXI · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité LavalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se revisan las críticas al enfoque de las habilidades<br />históricas y se sintetizan investigaciones<br />empíricas recientes sobre los<br />efectos de este enfoque en el aprendizaje<br />del pensamiento histórico. A este respecto,<br />se propone una comparación de la efectividad<br />de este enfoque en comparación<br />con el de la enseñanza centrada en la narrativa<br />ya construida del maestro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEducatio Siglo XXISame topicEducator Training and Historical PedagogyFrench-language works237,207