Fire Extinguishing Efficiency of Magnesium Hydroxide Powders under Different Particle Size
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After Montreal protocol, more and more new materials have been applied as the substitutes of Halon. Much attention has been paid to fire extinguishing efficiency of alkali metal salts and ammonium phosphate salts, but the effects of particle sizes have not been studied sufficiently. The fire-extinguishing efficiency of a new kind of agent based on magnesium hydroxide of different particle size was studied in this paper. Four different size powders have been used to study their fire-suppression efficiency through laboratory scale experiments in a confine space of 1<sup>∗</sup>1<sup>∗</sup>1m. The physical and chemical characteristics of the magnesium hydroxide powders were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and thermal gravity analysis (TGA). The results have exhibited that these four kinds of powders are all high efficient for the fire suppression efficiency and there is a threshold value of 5μm for the fire suppression efficiency of magnesium hydroxide. The efficiency can be affected by the morphology of powders and particle size. The powders of larger specific surface area and smaller particle size are more efficient to suppress fire. Fire extinguishing and possible fire-suppression mechanisms have also been analyzed from three aspects: chemical inhibition, cooling effect and asphyxiation effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it