MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791516270 · doi:10.1177/2045894018760656

A case of ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysm and reversible flow‐induced pulmonary hypertension

2018· article· en· W2791516270 on OpenAlexaff
Basil Al‐Sabeq, Sabe De, Ryan Davey

Bibliographic record

VenuePulmonary Circulation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineShuntingCardiologyPulmonary hypertensionInternal medicinePathophysiologyHemodynamicsSinus (botany)Intracardiac injectionAneurysmPulmonary vasculatureHeart diseaseRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and significant systemic-to-pulmonary shunting is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Its pathophysiology is incompletely understood, but involves a flow-induced pulmonary arteriopathy characterized by endothelial cell dysfunction and vascular remodeling that alters pulmonary arterial vasoreactivity. There is a paucity of literature linking PH with left-to-right shunting due to ruptured sinus of Valsalva aneurysms (SOVA). We present a unique case of reversible, flow-associated PH due to a ruptured congenital right SOVA fistulizing into the right atrium (RA), with emphasis on non-invasive and invasive assessment of pulmonary hemodynamics before and after surgical intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePulmonary CirculationSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207