Neuroradiologic manifestations of Erdheim-Chester disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> We describe the neuroradiologic features of a cohort of patients with Erdheim-Chester disease. <h3>Methods</h3> We assessed patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 1, 1990, and July 31, 2016, with pathologically confirmed Erdheim-Chester disease (n = 53). <h3>Results</h3> Neuroimaging, including head CT (n = 17), brain MRI (n = 39), orbital MRI (n = 15), and spine MRI (n = 16), was available for 42 participants. Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (interquartile range 46–66) with higher male prevalence (33:20). Neurologic symptoms were identified in 47% (25/53); BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> mutation in 58% (15/26). Median follow-up was 2 years (range 0–20) with 18 patients deceased. Radiologic disease evidence was seen in dura (6/41), brainstem (9/39), cerebellum (8/39), spinal cord (2/16), spinal epidura (2/16), hypothalamic-pituitary axis (17/39), and orbits (13/42). T2 white matter abnormalities (Fazekas score ≥1) were present in 21/34 patients. Diabetes insipidus was present in 30% (16/53); 8 had abnormal hypothalamic–pituitary axis imaging. Radiographic evidence of CNS involvement (i.e., dural, brain, including Fazekas score >1, or spinal cord) occurred in 55% (22/40) and was unassociated with significantly increased mortality. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Erdheim-Chester disease commonly and variably involves the neuraxis. Patients with suspected Erdheim-Chester disease should undergo MRI brain and spine and screening investigations (serum sodium, serum and urine osmolality) for diabetes insipidus to clarify extent of neurologic disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it