Covalently crosslinked mussel byssus protein‐based materials with tunable properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mussels’ anchoring threads, named byssus, are collagen‐rich fibers with outstanding mechanical properties. Our previous work has shown the possibility of producing a byssus protein hydrolyzate with good film‐forming ability, providing a promising new avenue for the preparation of biomaterials. Materials prepared from regenerated fibrous proteins often need additional treatments to reach the performance required for targeted applications. Here, we studied the effect of covalent crosslinking, using a carbodiimide or glutaraldehyde, on the mechanical properties and enzymatic resistance of byssus‐based materials. The results show that the mechanical properties of the films can be tuned, and that a higher crosslinking degree leads to increases in modulus and strength accompanied by a loss of extensibility. Structural analysis performed by infrared spectroscopy revealed that crosslinking induces an unexpected transition from aggregated strands to hydrated collagen/PPII‐related helical structures. The materials were nevertheless more resistant to collagenase degradation as a result of higher crosslinking density. This new set of materials prepared in aqueous environment could find a niche in tissue engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it