Towards the Design of Gravity-Based Wind Turbine Foundations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shear fatigue failure of reinforced concrete gravity-based wind turbine foundations is a major concern amongst designers, one that can potentially cause complete collapse of the whole turbine structure. In standard practice, such a failure is guarded against by using more concrete and steel, resulting in additional material and labour costs. Six SFRC and RC large-scale deep concrete beams were constructed and tested monotonically and cyclically in order to compare the contributions of conventional stirrups to the fatigue life of the beam with those of the steel fibres and verify the strain-based fatigue damage models developed at the University of Toronto. Results show that the contribution of the stirrups to the fatigue life of RC deep beams is marginal. The steel fibres, on the other hand, are a superior alternative both in terms of performance (fatigue life) and cost. Analytical results, using finite element analysis, show that the proposed fatigue models are reliable and superior to overly conservative code equations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it