MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791645381 · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30019-7

A false economy: we cannot afford to be complacent when it comes to tuberculosis control

2018· letter· en· W2791645381 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniela E. Kirwan, Robert H. Gilman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Public Health · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsTuberculosisIncidence (geometry)MedicinePsychological interventionPublic healthPopulationDemographySocioeconomic statusIndigenousGerontologyEnvironmental healthPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the 19th century a staggering one in four people died from tuberculosis. Incidence steadily declined with socioeconomic improvements and medical advances such that by the 1980s tuberculosis was considered a disease of the past and control measures were relaxed. This approach was premature: rising incidence led WHO to declare tuberculosis a global emergency in 1993. Control efforts were re-intensified and although incidence has now peaked, world population growth means that absolute numbers remain stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.039
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.118
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0390.118
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.027
Scholarly communication0.0150.035
Open science0.0040.011
Research integrity0.0160.044
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.170
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Public HealthSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207