MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791664214 · doi:10.14428/rcompro.vi3.513

La communication organisationnelle et numérique : formation en mutation, profession en construction

2016· article· fr· W2791664214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Communication & professionnalisation · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicBIM and Construction Integration
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophySociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le dispositif de l’apprentissage universitaire en communication paraît faire émerger de façon singulière la problématique de la construction des compétences du groupe professionnel des communicants. Nous supposons que ce type de dispositif pour une formation en communication à un niveau master soulève la problématique du primat du terrain dans la formation des compétences spécifiques à la communication des organisations. En d’autres termes, une appropriation de la formation des étudiants, notamment apprentis, par les professionnels, instaurés tuteurs d’apprentissage par le dispositif, pourrait-elle se faire aux dépends de la formation académique ? De récentes études montrent que la définition du groupe professionnel des communicants est fortement soumise aux mutations organisationnelles dues pour partie au numérique. Nous explorons, suivant une démarche compréhensive, cette écologie organisationnelle en cours de complexification et les effets d’une communication essentialisée par les professionnels dont le numérique est devenu l’instrument princeps. Nous avons procédé par questionnaires et entretiens auprès des étudiants et professionnels attachés à la formation par apprentissage d’un Master en communication à l’Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis. The university learning device in communication seems to emerge in a singular way the issue of the construction skills of the professional group of communicators. We assume that this type of device for communication training at a master level raises the issue of the primacy of the field in the formation skills specific to the communication of the organizations. In other words, ownership of the training of students, including apprentices, by professionals, learning tutors introduced by the device, it could be done at the expense of academic training? Recent studies show that the definition of » professional groups » of communicators is highly subject to organizational changes due in part to digital. We explore, following a comprehensive approach, this organizational ecology being complexity and the effects of essentialised communication professionals whose digital has become the instrument originator. We conducted by questionnaires and interviews with students and professionals committed to the apprenticeship of a Master in Communication at the University of Nice Sophia Antipolis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it