Coal pyrolysis and gasification in a fluidized bed thermogravimetric analyzer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The kinetics and modelling of coal gasification were studied in the newly developed fluidized bed thermogravimetric analyzer. The total weight loss obtained from the fluidized bed reactor and the total gas product are in general agreement. The presented model for the micro‐fluidized bed reactor encompasses the kinetics of coal pyrolysis as well as the gasification reactions. For coal pyrolysis, the resulting activation energies for the individual gases were 34.7 to 59.8 kcal/mol. These values are 19 to 21 % lower than those found in the literature for similar coals. This decrease of the activation energies of the endothermic pyrolysis reactions is attributed to a gradient of temperature of 185 to 209 °C. The obtained activation energy for the CO shift reaction is 46.6 kcal/mol, increasing by 20 % from the one used in the literature. This increase of the activation energy of such a mildly exothermic reaction represents an equivalent of 170 °C gradient of temperature. The effects of temperature on the yield and the composition of the gas product are studied. Experimental results and equilibrium data are also compared. The model shows reasonably good agreement with the experimental results, except for the water gas shift reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".