MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791711677 · doi:10.1002/bit.26556

Split trehalase as a versatile reporter for a wide range of biological analytes

2018· article· en· W2791711677 on OpenAlexafffund
Marija Drikic, Jeroen De Buck

Bibliographic record

VenueBiotechnology and Bioengineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiosensorAnalyteTrehalasePoint-of-care testingChromatographyPeriplasmic spaceChemistryTrehaloseBiochemistryBiotechnologyBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In health care, biosensors are envisioned as universal diagnostic devices with AAAA characteristics (i.e., available for anything, anywhere, anytime, to anyone). Despite numerous attempts to develop such a diagnostic device, none have managed to fulfill all four criteria and be commercialized. Glucometers, the most successful class of biosensor currently marketed monitor blood glucose concentrations. Their performance in clinical samples, including sensitivity and specificity, has been optimized and they are small and relatively inexpensive. We aimed to develop a technology that uses this existing biosensor, but adds versatility in detection of a wide range of analytes. Herein, we report the periplasmic trehalase of E. coli as a novel split enzyme reporter capable of converting a wide variety of analytes into glucose. Conditional complementation of trehalase fragments induced by detection of analytes, resulting in trehalose hydrolysis and glucose production, was used to detect antibodies and bacterial cells. We also demonstrated retention of split TreA activity in undiluted clinical samples. In conclusion, a trehalase-based biosensor platform offers a versatile and convenient method for point-of-care applications as it does not require sample preparation or handling and can be integrated with existing glucometers or sensors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiotechnology and BioengineeringSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207