MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791737749 · doi:10.1007/s00208-018-1650-7

Restriction estimates of $$\varepsilon $$ ε -removal type for k-th powers and paraboloids

2018· article· en· W2791737749 on OpenAlex
Kevin Henriot, Kevin Hughes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematische Annalen · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsDimension (graph theory)ParabolaType (biology)CombinatoricsVariety (cybernetics)Range (aeronautics)Mathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We obtain restriction estimates of $$\varepsilon $$ -removal type for the set of k-th powers of integers, and for discrete d-dimensional surfaces of the form $$\begin{aligned} \{ (n_1,\dots ,n_d,n_1^k + \cdots + n_d^k) \,:\, |n_1|,\dots ,|n_d| \leqslant N \}, \end{aligned}$$ which we term ‘k-paraboloids’. For these surfaces, we obtain a satisfying range of exponents for large values of d, k. We also obtain estimates of $$\varepsilon $$ -removal type in the full supercritical range for k-th powers and for k-paraboloids of dimension $$d < k(k-2)$$ . We rely on a variety of techniques in discrete harmonic analysis originating in Bourgain’s works on the restriction theory of the squares and the discrete parabola.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it