MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2791791273 · doi:10.1101/254409

Comprehensive characterization of transcript diversity at the human <i>NODAL</i> locus

2018· preprint· en· W2791791273 on OpenAlexaff
Scott D. Findlay, Lynne‐Marie Postovit

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Research and Splicing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNODALMorphogenNodal signalingBiologyEnhancerGeneticsRNA splicingLocus (genetics)Translation (biology)Embryonic stem cellMessenger RNAComputational biologyGeneCell biologyGene expressionRNAGastrulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract NODAL , a morphogen belonging to the transforming growth factor beta (TGβ) superfamily, is essential during embryogenesis where it induces axis formation and left-right asymmetry. NODAL is also required for the maintenance of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency, and emerges in many cancer types concomitant with metastasis and therapy resistance. Several enhancer elements have been shown to regulate mouse Nodal expression and studies have delineated mechanisms by which mRNA splicing and translation of NODAL homologues are regulated in model organisms. However, little is known regarding the co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional processing of human NODAL. Herein, we describe hitherto unreported RNAs which are transcribed from the NODAL locus, including an antisense transcript, a circular transcript, and multiple splice variants. These transcripts demonstrate the complexity of NODAL expression and highlight the need to consider each NODAL variant when attempting to quantify or target this morphogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRNA Research and Splicing→French-language works237,207→