MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791820083 · doi:10.1109/infocom.2018.8485845

MobiRate: Mobility-Aware Rate Adaptation Using PHY Information for Backscatter Networks

2018· article· en· W2791820083 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Gong, Si Chen, Jiangchuan Liu, Zhi Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThroughputChannel state informationChannel (broadcasting)Backscatter (email)Network packetPHYAdaptation (eye)Computer networkReal-time computingWirelessTelecommunicationsPhysical layer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past few years, various backscatter nodes have been invented for many emerging mobile applications, such as sports analytics, interactive gaming, and mobile healthcare. Backscatter networks are expected to provide a high-throughput and stable communication platform for those interconnected mobile nodes. Yet, through experiments, we find state-of-the-art rate adaptation methods for backscatter networks share a fundamental limitation of accommodating the hardware diversity of nodes because the common mapping paradigm that chooses the optimal rate based on the radio signal strength indicator (RSSI) or the like is hardly adaptable to hardware-dependent RSSIs. To address this issue, we propose MobiRate (Mobility-aware Rate adaptation) that fully exploits the mobility hints from PHY information and the characteristics of backscatter systems. The key insight is that mobility-hints, like velocity and position, can greatly benefit rate selection and channel probing. Specifically, we introduce a novel velocity-based loss rate estimation method that dynamically re-weighs packets based on time and mobility. In addition, we design a mobility-assisted probing trigger and a new selective-probing mechanism, significantly saving probing time. As MobiRate is fully compatible with the current standard, it is prototyped using a COTS RFID reader and a variety of commercial tags. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that MobiRate achieves up to 3.8x throughput gain over the state-of-the-art methods across a wide range of mobility, channel conditions, and tag types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207