MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791839775 · doi:10.1002/cnma.201800059

Solid‐State Route for the Synthesis of Scalable, Luminescent Silicon and Germanium Nanocrystals

2018· article· en· W2791839775 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxine J. Kirshenbaum, Matthew G. Boebinger, Michael J. Katz, Matthew T. McDowell, Mita Dasog

Bibliographic record

VenueChemNanoMat · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandDalhousie University
FundersResearch and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and LabradorDalhousie UniversityGeorgia Institute of Technology
KeywordsMaterials scienceLuminescenceNanocrystalHydrosilylationMesoporous materialGermaniumSiliconNanotechnologyOxideMetalQuantum dotNanometreSolid-stateMesoporous silicaChemical engineeringOptoelectronicsCatalysisChemistryPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Group 14 nanocrystals (NCs) have gained significant attention in the last decade largely owing to their unique and tunable optoelectronic properties, allowing for diverse applications across a range of fields. Herein we report a gram‐scale method to prepare Si and Ge NCs from mesoporous metal oxides using a solid‐state metallothermic reduction method. Mesoporous SiO2 and GeO2 were prepared using a templated sol‐gel method. The influence of pore size of the metal oxide precursor and the nature of reducing metal on the formation of Si and Ge was investigated. The NCs were functionalized with dodecyl groups via microwave‐assisted hydrosilylation and hydrogermylation reactions, respectively. Si and Ge NCs were found to have tunable visible or near‐IR luminescence with high emission quantum yields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemNanoMatSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207