MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791850494 · doi:10.1117/12.2291216

In-vivo volumetric imaging of the cellular structure of healthy and pathological human cornea with high-speed UHR-OCT (Conference Presentation)

2018· article· en· W2791850494 on OpenAlexaff
Zohreh Hosseinaee, Bingyao Tan, Kirsten Carter, Denise Hileeto, Luigina Sorbara, Kostadinka Bizheva

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresentation (obstetrics)CorneaPathologicalPreclinical imagingIn vivoBiomedical engineeringMedicineOphthalmologyPathologyRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Degenerative conditions such as keratoconus and Fuch’s dystrophy can alter over time the cellular structure of the human corneal epithelium and endothelium respectively. A high-speed UHR-OCT system, capable of generating volumetric images of the cellular structure of the human cornea was built. The UHR-OCT system has a compact fiber-optic design that utilizes a commercial femtolaser with the central wavelength of 790 nm and 3dB spectral bandwidth of 150 nm to achieve ~ 1.4 µm axial resolution in corneal tissue. The optical design of the OCT imaging probe ensured ~2 µm OCT lateral resolution in corneal tissue. At the detection end of the UHR-OCT system, a high-resolution spectrometer (Cobra, Wasatch Photonics) is interfaced with a novel line scan camera. The camera has a tall pixel design, 2048 pixel array and a maximum readout rate of 250 kHz. The system’s SNR was 96 dB at 100 µm away from the zero delay line, with a 10 dB roll-off over 1.5 mm scanning range for ~800 µm power of the imaging beam incident on the corneal surface. Volumetric images of healthy and pathological corneas were acquired in-vivo from healthy volunteers and subjects with keratoconus and Fuch’s dystrophy and the images were compared with typical histological images. This study was approved by the University of Waterloo Research Ethics Committee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207