Conhecimento das Gestantes acerca do Parto na Admissão Intrapartal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O nascimento de uma criança é, sem dúvida, o evento mais importante na vida dos seres humanos, seja para quem estará gestando e parindo, seja para criança e mesmo para aqueles que os cercam. Neste sentido, a assistência é importante, especialmente quando ao desfecho do evento, ao parto. Deste modo o presente trabalho buscou, através de um estudo de campo avaliar a importância do conhecimento de gestantes acerca do parto no favorecimento para o desfecho gestacional típico. Deste modo, observou-se que no serviço há uma predominância de partos cesáreos, que as informações prestadas no pré-natal são insuficientes, e ainda que mesmo motivadas para o parto vaginal, os desfechos são, em sua maioria cesáreas sem indicações legítimas para tal. Diante dos resultados conclui-se que há a necessidade de revisitar práticas e muda-las de modo a buscar o devido respeito a mulher e o provimento das melhores estratégias de cuidado as pessoas envolvidas no evento do parto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".