MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791955041

The effects of adaptive error correcting schemes on satellite optimized TCP

2007· dissertation· en· W2791955041 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. Graumann

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2007
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSatelliteError analysisMathematicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the popularity of satellite networks as a means for Internet delivery, the performance of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) over satellite links has been well studied.Unfortunately, the protocol has shown problems with channel utilization in such environments, which is a key performance factor for satellite operators.Performance enhancing proxies are one solution to this problem, and have been shown to provide significant improvements in channel utilization.Recent research, however, has been focused on the use of adaptive error correction in satellite networks at the lower layers, resulting in the ratification of the DVB-S2 standa¡d.While adaptive error correction can improve channel utilization when channel conditions are good, it also results in decreases in available user bitrate during noisy periods due to the addition of parity bits.The research performed in this thesis shows that the throughput of a performance enhancing proxy suffers when adaptive error correction is introduced, resulting in up to 20Vo of the bandwidth being wasted during poor channel conditions.A solution involving the addition of a simple bandwidth estimation scheme to the proxy is studied, and is successful in increasing the average channel utilization in poor conditions to almost 90Vo.Alternatively, it is shown that the introduction of a secondary TCP flow running in parallel with the performance enhancing proxy traffic can result in neat lÙOVo channel utilization when priority queues are introduced at the satellite gateway.Tightly integrating performance enhancing proxies with the satellite gateways that employ adaptive effor correction is recommended as the best solution.-tr-AcTNowLEDcEMENTS Many thanks to my family for their patience and support during my thesis, in particular to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207