MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791960350

Libye : que faire de la Révolution ?

2010· preprint· fr· W2791960350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPIRE (Sciences Po) · 2010
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Geopolitics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surmontant les trois défis qui le menaçaient au cours de la décennie quatre-vingt-dix (dissidence islamiste armée, sanctions internationales et tentatives de coup d’Etat), le régime libyen est parvenu à survivre et à exploiter les deux opportunités qui se sont offertes à lui : les attentats du 11 septembre 2001 et l’invasion de l’Irak en mars 2003. En fin tacticien, M. Qadhafi a intégré la Libye dans « la guerre contre le terrorisme mondial » et a construit de son pays l’image d’un Eldorado en Méditerranée. Cette conversion s’est accompagnée d’un nouveau langage, adapté au standard de la communauté internationale où fleurissent les termes de transparence, de lutte contre la corruption et de démocratie. Ce changement est le produit d’une nouvelle « stratégie économique nationale » (...).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it