MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792006229 · doi:10.1089/bio.2017.0109

Standard PREanalytical Code Version 3.0

2018· article· en· W2792006229 on OpenAlexaff
Fay Betsou, Roberto Bilbao, Jamie Case, Rodrigo Chuaqui, Judith A. Clements, Yvonne De Souza, Annemieke De Wilde, Jörg Geiger, William E. Grizzle, Fiorella Guadagni, Elaine W. Gunter, Stacey Heil, Michael Kiehntopf, Iren Koppandi, Sabine Lehmann, Loes Linsen, Jacqueline Mackenzie‐Dodds, Rocío Aguilar‐Quesada, Riad Tebbakha, Teresa Selander, Katheryn Shea, Mark E. Sobel, Stella Somiari, Demetri D. Spyropoulos, Mars Stone, Gunnel Tybring, Klara Valyi‐Nagy, Lalita Wadhwa, the ISBER Biospecimen Science Worki

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopreservation and Biobanking · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCode (set theory)Programming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.076
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.354
Threshold uncertainty score0.921

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.076
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3540.332

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiopreservation and BiobankingSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207