La chanson de tradition orale des Pays d’en haut : un tour d’horizon
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si l’on devait considérer l’ensemble des « régions à l’ouest et au nord de Montréal », la notion de « folklore des Pays d’en haut » pourrait, à elle seule, faire l’objet d’un colloque entier. Notre propos, plus modeste, se limite à la chanson. La documentation écrite des chroniqueurs atteste déjà, dès l’ouverture de ces territoires jusqu’à la fin du xixe siècle, la présence marquante de la chanson de tradition orale, même si les retranscriptions intégrales y sont clairsemées. La captation de la littérature orale auprès de témoins vivants est une invention toute récente. Inaugurée par Marius Barbeau en 1914, elle a touché l’Outaouais puis le nord de l’Ontario au milieu du xxe siècle et n’a guère débordé cette province avant les années 1970. Cet exposé esquisse à grands traits l’état présent de la documentation orale connue sur ces régions à l’ouest de l’Outaouais, en attente d’une étude plus fouillée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".