MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792138370 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.606

P479 Quality of care and outcomes in a tertiary hospital inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) centre: Monitoring and treatment algorithms during follow-up

2018· article· en· W2792138370 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zsuzsanna Kürti, Sophie Restellini, Lóránt Gönczi, Waqqas Afif, Talat Bessissow, Gary Wild, Ernest G. Seidman, Rita Kohen, Alain Bitton, Péter L. Lakatos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineColonoscopyUlcerative colitisMedical recordDiseaseRetrospective cohort studyEmergency medicinePediatricsColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimal management of IBD requires harmonised monitoring processes and treatment pathways. We aimed to retrospectively analyse quality of care indicators (QIs) during follow-up including patient monitoring, treatment decisions and outcomes in the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) IBD Center. We retrospectively analysed out- and inpatient records of consecutive patients at the MUHC IBD centre between June and December 2016. Demographic variables, outpatient visits, inpatient stays including for IBD-related surgery, laboratory, imaging and endoscopy data, current medications and/or changes in medications, and vaccination profile were captured. A total of 653 patients (46.2% men, 66.6% Crohn’s disease (CD), age at index follow-up visit: 44.7 years, duration of follow-up: 4.2 years) were included. Complicated behaviour and perianal disease were found at index visit in, respectively, 47% and 24% of CD patients, while extensive UC in 41%. 44% of patients received biologics among which 11% non-anti TNF-biologics. Patient re-evaluation was common: ileocolonoscopy was performed in 34 %, MRI in 11% and CT in 23% within 6 months after index visit. Biomarkers were measured frequently (CRP: 67%, FCAL: 33%). New or repeated HBV/HCV testing was performed in 20%, C. difficile in 28%, stool culture in 24%, TB in 10%, therapeutic drug monitoring was performed in 26% of patients on biologics. Treatment was changed in 18%. Need for surgery (4%) and hospitalisation (8%) were relatively low within 6 months after index visit. Waiting time for ileocolonoscopy (35 vs. 60 days, p < 0.001), but not for cross-sectional imaging (45–48 days for MRI, 25–30 days for CT), was shorter in active disease. Our data support that tight monitoring strategy is applied in the MUHC IBD centre during follow-up with objective patient reassessment and accelerated medical strategy in patients with and without flares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→