MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792147511 · doi:10.1353/cri.2016.0084

Elusive Refuge: Chinese Migrants in the Cold War by Laura Madokoro

2016· article· en· W2792147511 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Glennys Young

Bibliographic record

VenueChina review international · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeePoliticsHistoriographyHistoryPolitical scienceWhite (mutation)Face (sociological concept)Gender studiesEconomic historyWorld War IISociologyLawSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Elusive Refuge: Chinese Migrants in the Cold War by Laura Madokoro Glennys Young (bio) Laura Madokoro. Elusive Refuge: Chinese Migrants in the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016. x, 331 pp. Hardcover $45.00, isbn 978-0-674-97151-6. 65.3 million refugees (including asylum seekers and other displaced persons) around the world: that is the figure given by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in December 2015. Given the refugee crises in the early twenty-first century, any book on the subject has enormous contemporary relevance. In order to understand the refugee crises that we face, and to attempt to solve them, a historical perspective is invaluable. A crucial dimension of such understanding is the emergence of the "refugee," and "refugeehood" as contested statuses over the course of the twentieth century, especially in the wake of World War II, when camps for displaced persons existed in many parts of Europe. But while there is a substantial historiography [End Page 81] on the European origins, politics, and legacy of refugeehood in the second half of the twentieth century, historians have examined Asian refugees in much less detail. Laura Madokoro's superbly researched and analytically astute book, which focuses on refugees from the PRC to Hong Kong and their subsequent movement during the Cold War to white settler societies such as the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, makes a major contribution to overcoming that imbalance. In 1951, two years after the establishment of the PRC accelerated the movement of Chinese to Hong Kong, the United Nations "Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees" advanced a definition of "refugee" that attested to the Cold War's role in shaping the conceptual categories of global politics in the second half of the twentieth century. By specifying that "refugee" was the status of an individual—as opposed to a group—who had suffered or feared political persecution, and by exempting Asia from its spatial parameters, the UN's definition was narrow yet ambiguous. Among the transnational nexuses in which governments, humanitarian groups, NGOs, and would-be migrants engaged in complex negotiations about who was, and was not, a refugee was Hong Kong, since 1842 a British colony with a window on both "East" and "West." Hong Kong was a destination for migrants from China, and elsewhere in Asia, even before the establishment of the PRC. In the final years of the Chinese Civil War, over 200,000 people, the colonial government claimed, fled to Hong Kong. That number increased over three fold from 1949 to 1950: 700,000 arrived during that time span, or, roughly a third of the colony's population of 2 million. Although these human beings believed that Hong Kong would be a refuge, they often lived in squatter camps where conditions were far from humane. With the newcomers overwhelming infrastructure, and engendering concerns for political, social, and economic stability, the government of Hong Kong sought to use the "malleable nature of the refugee label" (p. 52) as a weapon of exclusion. Prior to 1954, the government's conflation of "refugee" with "squatter" facilitated its attempts to clear the squatters and put pressure on them to leave. A tragic fire in December 1953 in the squatter settlement of Shek Kip Mei, however, catalyzed a new conceptualization in public discussions of refugees as immigrants deserving of permanent housing. At the same time as Hong Kong officials sought to use the slippery elasticity of the "refugee" category to limit arrivals from the PRC as well as, at times, to render their suffering invisible, a variety of humanitarian aid groups having different agendas (direct aid, development, and/or resettlement) tried to improve their plight. At times, this meant restoring visibility to the Asian refugees excluded by the 1951 Geneva Convention. The efforts of humanitarian groups in this regard were aided by World Refugee Year in 1959. But [End Page 82] photographs of Chinese migrants seeking refuge in 1962 from the famines of the Cultural Revolution appeared in U.S. magazines, such as those shot by Larry Burgess for Time, taught American readers that victims of Communist oppression were not only European (such as the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChina review internationalSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207