MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792160459 · doi:10.5150/cmcm.2017.022

Impact of urbanized rivers inputs on sediments of two contrasted coastal Mediterranean areas: Toulon Bay (France) and St-Georges Bay (Lebanon)

2017· article· en· W2792160459 on OpenAlexaff
Amonda El Houssainy, Carine Abi-Ghanem, Gaël Durrieu, Duc Huy Dang, Céline Mahfouz, Dario Omanović, Sébastien D’Onofrio, Jean‐Ulrich Mullot, Gaby Khalaf, Cédric Garnier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsTrent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayMediterranean climateOceanographyMediterranean seaEnvironmental scienceEcosystemGeologyPollutantSedimentPopulationMarine ecosystemHydrology (agriculture)GeographyEcologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mediterranean Sea (MS) is a semi-enclosed sea hosting a high population density and is exposed to numerous anthropogenic activities that contaminate the surrounding environment with pollutants such as trace metals (TM).TM distribution is influenced by numerous (bio) geochemical processes which can turn sediments into a secondary source of contaminants for the ecosystem.In this study, we investigate TM contamination in two coastal Mediterranean sites: Toulon Bay (Northwestern MS, France) and St-Georges Bay (Eastern MS, Lebanon).Both sites are submitted to anthropogenic pressures and host urbanized coastal rivers (Las River and Beirut River, respectively).Even, if Las River contribution is non-negligible for few elements but it contributes in dilution of past pollutions of the bay.In contrast, sediments from St-Georges Bay are impacted by several anthropogenic activities transported through Beirut River.Additionally, early diagenesis highly affects TM mobility in the sediments of these two ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeavy metals in environment→French-language works237,207→