MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792165117 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v42i09a07

Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Statement Update on the Recommended Use of Hepatitis A Vaccine

2016· article· en· W2792165117 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Brandon Michael Henry, O Baclic

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Agency of Canada
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationImmunizationAdvisory committeeAsymptomaticHepatitis A vaccineHepatitis AJaundiceHepatitis B vaccineHepatitisFamily medicinePediatricsDiseaseHepatitis BEnvironmental healthImmunologyInternal medicineImmune systemHepatitis B virusVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The severity of hepatitis A (HA) increases with age. Children less than six years of age are commonly asymptomatic or present with mild disease without jaundice and represent an important source of infection, particularly for household members and other close contacts. In older children and adults, HA is typically symptomatic. Older persons and individuals with chronic liver disease and immunocompromising conditions have an increased risk of progressing to fulminant hepatic failure resulting in death. Immunization with HA vaccine is recommended for pre-exposure immunization of persons at increased risk of infection or severe HA, as well as within 14 days of HA exposure for: susceptible household and close contacts of proven or suspected cases of HA; co-workers and clients of infected food handlers; and staff and attendees of group child care centres and kindergartens where HA has occurred. Canada's National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has previously recommended HA vaccination for persons one year of age and over. OBJECTIVES: To make recommendations for the use of HA vaccine in infants less than one year of age and to clarify recommendations for the post-exposure use of human immune globulin (Ig). METHODS: The NACI Hepatitis Working Group (HWG) performed literature reviews and reviewed vaccine manufacturer provided data on the topic of HA post-exposure prophylaxis. All evidence was rated and reported in evidence tables. A knowledge synthesis was performed and NACI approved specific evidence-based recommendations, elucidating the rationale and relevant considerations. RESULTS: No studies on the efficacy or effectiveness of HA-containing vaccines in children six to less than 12 months of age were identified through the literature search. Receipt of two doses of HA-containing vaccines was found to be safe and immunogenic in infants six to 12 months of age. Limited data were available regarding HA-containing vaccine immunogenicity in adults over the age of 40 years. CONCLUSION: There are now new NACI recommendations on HA vaccine and post-exposure use of Ig.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicHepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207