MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792275518 · doi:10.5539/ijel.v8n4p155

Classroom Management: A Challenging Part in Beginning English Teachers’ Career Entry Stage

2018· article· en· W2792275518 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adnan Ahmad Tahir, Akhtar Iqbal, Abrar Hussain Qureshi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of English Linguistics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Technology Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProfessionalizationClassroom managementStratified samplingSocializationPsychologySample (material)Perspective (graphical)Adaptation (eye)Mathematics educationMedical educationPedagogySociologyComputer scienceMedicineSocial scienceDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Classroom management is the vital professional content of successful professionalization of beginning teachers. This study explores the challenges beginning English teacher face in classroom management during early years of teaching career. Through survey method and using a valid questionnaire tool the required data was collected and then analyzed statistically using SPSS 16. A sample of beginning English teachers was carefully chosen through stratified sampling from 43 schools located in Faisalabad city, Pakistan. In total, 113 participants responded to questionnaires and 20 participated in the interviews. It was found that a large number of students in classes, variation in cognitive approach and mother tongue, adaptation to new teaching and learning techniques, and ineptness in using latest ICT based audio-visual aids are main challenges in classroom management that affect the ultimate performance of beginning English teachers. These issues require more attention to improve teachers’ performance. It is hoped that findings of this study would help beginning teachers and educationists in developing strategies to cope with classroom management challenges in the perspective professional socialization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.966

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of English LinguisticsSame topicEducation and Technology IntegrationFrench-language works237,207