MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792284013 · doi:10.1111/polp.12239

Policy Transfer and Diversification in Resource‐Dependent Economies: Lessons for Kazakhstan from Alberta

2018· article· en· W2792284013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Howie

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitics &amp Policy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversification (marketing strategy)PoliticsIndustrialisationPolitical scienceCapitalismPublic policyIndustrial policyEconomicsEconomyEconomic growthBusinessInternational tradeMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Economic diversification in resource‐dependent countries is a difficult process. Most of these countries’ efforts to diversify have been unsuccessful. Alberta is one exception. It has succeeded in diversifying its economy by “diversifying in energy” using explicit policy decisions to promote human capital development in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), complement STEM education with education in management and innovation, foster proper market discipline, establish an effective intellectual property rights system, and strengthen links between various industries to support innovation. Kazakhstan's policy makers can learn valuable lessons from Alberta's successes. It is also important to understand that some of the initiatives that were successful in Alberta may not be appropriate for Kazakhstan because of the latter's system of state‐guided capitalism and limited public service capacity. Finally, evidence from Alberta suggests that promoting “winning” sectors is a way for favored insiders to capture a share of resource rent and seldom succeed. Related Articles Khodr , Hiba , and Isabella Ruble . 2013 . “.” Politics & Policy 41 (): 656 ‐ 689 . http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12033/full Khodr , Hiba . 2014 . “.” Politics & Policy 42 (): 271 ‐ 310 . http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12068/full Kim , Hae S . 2017 . “.” Politics & Policy 45 (): 83 ‐ 104 . http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12190/full Related Media . 2003 . “Should Developing Country Industrialisation Policies Encourage Processing of Primary Commodities?”The ACP‐EU Courier196: 30‐32. http://ec.europa.eu/development/body/publications/courier/courier196/en/en_030.pdf Litan , Robert E ., and Carl J. Schramm . 2007 . “Good Capitalism, Bad Capitalism, and the Economics of Growth and Prosperity.”Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/event/good-capitalism-bad-capitalism-and-economics-growth-and-prosperity . 2015 . “Economic Diversification and Nonextractive Growth.” InEngagement in Resource‐Rich Developing Countries: The Cases of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and Zambia. Washington, DC: World Bank. 28‐42. http://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/sites/default/files/Data/reports/chapters/ccpe-synthesis_ch4.pdf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitics &amp PolicySame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207