Power System Coherency Identification Under High Depth of Penetration of Wind Power
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper extends the dynamic coherency determination (DCD) method by including Type-3 wind power plants (WPPs) models in the coherency evaluation process and quantifies impacts of the high depth of wind power penetration on the coherency phenomena of interconnected power systems. The method is based on frequency-deviation signals, measured at nongenerator buses and terminal buses of WPPs and synchronous generators. Salient features of the presented method are its ability to account for the hybrid nature of enhanced generic models of Type-3 WPPs and expanding notion of the power system coherency beyond the classical definition by including models of Type-3 WPPs. This paper also investigates impacts of the high depth of wind power penetration; i.e., up to 30%, on the coherency structure of the 16-machine/68-bus NPCC equivalent system. The studies are based on time-domain simulations in PSS/E software. The investigations reveal that Type-3 WPPs can introduce new coherent areas, significantly change areas' boundaries and number of areas, and alter frequencies/dampings of interarea modes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".