MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792333279 · doi:10.1109/wispnet.2017.8299728

Analysis of optimal backhaul link selection in a novel maritime communication network

2017· article· en· W2792333279 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J P Dhivvya, Sethuraman N Rao, S. Simi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian National Centre for Ocean Information ServicesIndian Space Research OrganisationMultiple Sclerosis Scientific Research Foundation
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer networkComputer scienceLink (geometry)Selection (genetic algorithm)TelecommunicationsBase stationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Offshore fishing is serving as a major livelihood for millions of people around the world. OceanNet project aims at developing an effective, low-cost, long range communication system to provide internet connectivity at the sea. Wireless Backhaul network is formed by connecting Base Station (BS) in the shore to the Adaptive Backhaul Equipment (ABE) in the boats. The fishermen fishing in a particular fishing zone form a cluster. A mesh network is formed in the clusters to improve the connectivity. In this work, OceanNet Backhaul Link Selection (OBLS) algorithm is implemented in a hardware test-bed that models the OceanNet topology to assess the feasibility of using this in the off-shore boats. It also proposes and implements a controller as a static node in the Base Station network which analyzes the connectivity based on signal strength, noise floor and link quality and selects the best backhaul links by redirecting the route from Access Routers to the ABE having good Signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio to reach the Base Station. The throughput tests analyzed demonstrate that the packet delivery ratio is improved to a large extent after the application of the OBLS algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207