Evolution des paramètres biochimiques et hématologiques chez les personnes vivant avec le VIH SIDA sous traitement antirétroviral au Centre Médical du Camp General Aboubacar Sangoule Lamizana (CMCGASL)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of treatment on biochemical and hematological parameters in HIV-positive patients followed up at the Aboubacar Sangoulé Lamizana General Camp Medical Center in Burkina Faso. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study over the period January 2010-September 2015. The study only included HIV-positive patients treated with ART having undergone laboratory tests at treatment initiation (M0), at sixth month (M6), and at twelfth month (M12). RESULTS: at M12 (p<0.05). Anaemic patients showed a significant increase in the rate of mean haemoglobin levels from 10.5 g/dl at M0 to 12.53 g/dl at M12 (p<0.05). The analysis of biochemical parameters could not be performed because of a lack of data. CONCLUSION: The increase in the rate of TCD4 lymphocytes and in the rate of hemoglobin levels gives an indication of ART effectiveness and of patient's tolerance to treatment. Viral load test accessibility and an improvement in laboratory testing monitoring are essential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".