MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792354310 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2018.2804928

An Optimal Real-Time Distributed Algorithm for Utility Maximization of Mobile Ad Hoc Cloud

2018· article· en· W2792354310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingWireless ad hoc networkUtility maximizationDistributed computingMobile ad hoc networkMaximizationAlgorithmComputer networkWirelessMathematical optimizationTelecommunicationsMathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we investigate utility maximization of mobile ad hoc cloud with an incentive mechanism to encourage mobile devices to share their idle resources. Considering that at different time slots the amount of resources demanded by the resource buyer (RB) is different and the revenue of per unit resource obtained by resource providers (RPs) is different, a real-time distributed algorithm is developed. First, by analyzing the preferences of the RB and RPs, the utility function and cost function are developed for them, respectively. Then, we propose a real-time distributed algorithm to find the maximum utility of the overall system under the price incentive mechanism, where the obtained optimal pricing can align the individual optimality with the overall system optimality. Simulation results confirm that the proposed algorithm can maximize the utility of the overall system compared with the state-of-the-art schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it