Chinese Remainder Theorem-Based Sequence Design for Resource Block Assignment in Relay-Assisted Internet-of-Things Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Terminal relays are expected to play a key role in facilitating the communication between base stations and low-cost power-constrained cellular Internet of Things (IoT) devices. However, these mobile relays require a mechanism by which they can autonomously assign the available resource blocks (RBs) to their assisted IoT devices in the absence of channel state information (CSI) and with minimal assignment conflicts. To address this problem, in this paper, we develop an autonomous sequence-based RB assignment scheme that dispenses with CSI. The sequences underlying the proposed scheme are designed using the Chinese remainder theorem (CRT). In particular, the CRT is used to combine the cyclic sequences generated by simple cyclic group structures into longer ones. The combining process introduces additional degrees of freedom in sequence generation, thereby enriching the set of RB assignment sequences. Simulation results show that the sequences generated by the proposed CRT-based scheme outperform those generated by currently available autonomous ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it