Fluxo espontâneo e capacidade de jogo: estudos atorais a partir de
princípios do teatro-esporte e do match de improvisação
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the relevance of improvisation work to THEATRESPORTS and the MATCH OF IMPROVISATION in 'scenic training' and in the actor's preparation, analyzing their components, execution dynamics and development that has been consolidating in Canada, Argentina and European countries as an artistic practice and not so much explored as a pedagogical-theatrical instrument.In Brazil, there are groups working with these practices, but in literature there are few academic researches on Theatresports and Match.Moreover, it has not so far made for Portuguese translations of Keith Johnstone's works.As base study structures about the importance of improvisation in actor training, the principles researched are Keith Johnstone's "Theatresports" and Gravel's and Leduc's "Match of Improvisation" as well as an experience based on Melodrama games as enhancers of GAME CAPABILITY and SPONTANEOUS FLOW of actors' creations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it