Impact of Motivation on Employee Performance: A Study of Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Eduaction
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: ObservationalConsensus signal: Observational
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.026
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.515
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
The study focused on the effect of motivation on employees’ performance using Alvan Ikoku Federal College of Education (AIFCE) as study area. It is an empirical study whose major source of data was primary source through questionnaire. The main objective is to ascertain the work behavior of employees amidst their motivation. The study adopted reinforcement theory as framework of analysis. It is a survey research whose data analysis was done quantitatively and hypothesis tested via Chi-square (X2). It was our finding that there is significant relationship between staff motivation and staff performance. The study therefore recommends that organizations should consider staff motivation as a cardinal responsibility. The study concludes that unless staff motivation is properly executed, organizations and their managers will always suffer employees’ negative attitude to work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Management and Strategy
- Topic
- Management and Performance Evaluation
- Field
- Business, Management and Accounting
- Canadian institutions
- not available
- Funders
- not available
- Keywords
- PsychologyWork motivationWork (physics)Motivation theoryEmpirical researchEmployee motivationApplied psychologyPublic relationsSocial psychologyPolitical scienceEngineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes