MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792473229 · doi:10.4000/cal.8342

Bolivia: proceso electoral prematuro e incertidumbres del post-evismo

2017· article· es· W2792473229 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Lazarte R.

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers des Amériques latines · 2017
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and political discourse analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bolivia vive un proceso electoral nacional prematuro y precipitado desde el momento en que el gobierno decidió a sólo un año de su nuevo mandato, promover el referendo de 21 de febrero de 2016. El propósito era modificar el artículo 168 de la Constitución Política del Estado (CPE), que le impide al actual Presidente, Evo Morales, ser reelegido más de una vez, de manera continua. La derrota en las urnas, que el gobierno no preveía, y sobre todo su empeño posterior por encontrar otras vías para...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers des Amériques latinesSame topicCultural and political discourse analysisFrench-language works237,207