MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792473351 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx180.410

P283 Predicting outcomes in paediatric Crohn’s disease: A systematic review

2018· review· en· W2792473351 on OpenAlexaffabout
Amanda Ricciuto, M Aardoom, Esther Orlanski‐Meyer, Nicholas Carman, Dan Turner, Lissy de Ridder, Anne M. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioObservational studyDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineConfidence intervalCrohn's diseaseCohort studyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn’s disease (CD) developing during childhood and adolescence encompasses a spectrum of phenotypes and disease severity. Risk stratification to facilitate early, more individualised therapy is key to optimizing outcomes. We aimed to systematically review the evidence pertaining to prediction of chronically active inflammatory activity and disease complications in paediatric CD. We searched Pubmed and EMBASE from 1992 to 2017 for observational or controlled, English language studies reporting longitudinal associations between patient/disease characteristics and chronically active inflammatory disease or the following CD complications: B2/B3/perianal disease, linear growth impairment, bone disease, surgery, response to therapy and disease extension. Study selection was performed by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. The search identified 97 eligible studies (all observational). The majority focused on associations with surgery (n = 46), internal stricturing (B2) (n = 32) or penetrating (B3) (n = 30) complications; fewer on growth impairment (n = 20) or perianal fistulising disease (n = 19); and very few on chronically active inflammatory disease (n = 9) or bone disease (n = 10). In a large (n = 913) prospective study, older age and non-Caucasian ethnicity were associated with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–1.8) and 3.2 (1.4–7.3), respectively, for B3 complications. Across several studies, ASCA IgG was associated with aHRs of 2.7 to 2.8 for B3 disease and CBir1 with aHRs of 2.3 to 3.0 for B2 and/or B3 disease. In a single large study, the aHR of OmpC for B2 and/or B3 disease was 2.4 (1.2–4.9). Across several studies, male sex was associated with HRs of 3.6 to 3.9 for linear growth impairment. Lower weight and BMI, and more active disease were associated with lower bone mineral density over time. Table 1 lists factors for which at least one study reported an association with an outcome of interest. The number of studies demonstrating a positive association, amongst all studies examining the predictor, is shown in brackets. No clear risk factors were identified for chronically active inflammatory disease. Factors with at least 1 study demonstrating an association with an outcome of interest (numbers in brackets indicate the number of studies showing an association amongst all studies examining that factor). Factors with at least 1 study demonstrating an association with an outcome of interest (numbers in brackets indicate the number of studies showing an association amongst all studies examining that factor). The majority of identified predictors are observed demographic or phenotypic associations. To date, only antimicrobial serology provides additional guidance for individualising treatment based on risk prediction. Molecular predictors of chronically active inflammatory disease and biologic treatment responsiveness are badly needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.009
Bibliometrics0.0070.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207