Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article tudie la gestion, par cinq rdactions en ligne belges, des commentaires que les internautes postent au sujet de la langue des journalistes. Trois questions sont poses : ces commentaires sur la langue sont-ils visibles ou sont-ils filtrs par les rdactions ? Engendrent-ils des corrections dans les articles journalistiques ? Quelles ractions suscitent-ils chez les administrateurs ? Internautes et administrateurs semblent partager une sorte d' idologie du sans faute en matire de langue. Nanmoins, les contraintes professionnelles des journalistes en ligne les empchent, selon eux, d'atteindre leur idal linguistique. Bien que la relecture des internautes profite aux rdactions dans une certaine mesure, l'empreinte linguistique des commentaires d'internautes, tant du point de vue de leur visibilit que de leur influence, est limite par le dsintrt que portent les rdactions la gestion des commentaires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it