MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792494406 · doi:10.1109/tia.2018.2819618

Power Electronic Converter Based PMSG Emulator: A Testbed for Renewable Energy Experiments

2018· article· en· W2792494406 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammadhossein Ashourianjozdani, Luiz A. C. Lopes, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermanent magnet synchronous generatorTestbedEngineeringElectronic engineeringVoltage controllerComputer scienceVoltage sourceControl theory (sociology)VoltageElectrical engineeringVoltage droop

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a converter-based permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) emulator as a testbed for designing, analyzing, and testing of the generator's power electronic interface and its control system. The PMSG model is formulated in a real-time digital simulator. A voltage type ideal transformer model combined with a virtual impedance is presented as an interface algorithm. The design procedure and implementation of the virtual impedance in a simulation platform is discussed. A six-switch voltage source converter is used as a power amplifier to mimic the behavior of the PMSG supplying linear and nonlinear loads. A proportional-integral plus resonant controller is proposed as a voltage loop controller for tracking a distorted output voltage reference signal. The accuracy of the proposed emulator is investigated for the fundamental and low-order voltage harmonics. Technical challenges of the PMSG emulator are considered and proper solutions are suggested. The performance of the proposed emulator is compared with an actual PMSG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207