Genetic parameter estimates and targeted association analyses of growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in German Merinoland and Merinoland-cross lambs1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, genetic parameters of nine growth, carcass, and meat quality (MQ) traits were estimated, and targeted association studies were conducted using mixed models. Phenotypic information was collected on 1,599 lambs, including both purebred Merinoland (ML) animals and five different F1 crosses. The F1 lambs were produced by mating rams of the meat-type breeds Charollais, Ile de France, German Blackheaded Mutton (Deutsches Schwarzköpfiges Fleischschaf), Suffolk, and Texel with ML ewes. Between four and six sires were used per sire breed. In total, 29 sires and 298 purebred ML sheep were genotyped with the Illumina OvineSNP50 BeadChip. All F1 individuals were genotyped for 289 SNPs located on the chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 18, and 21. These SNPs were used to impute SNPs on five chromosomes of the Illumina Ovine chip in the F1 individuals. Several Bonferroni-corrected significant associations were identified for shoulder width. A number of additional significant associations were found for other traits. Genetic parameters were estimated and single-marker association analyses were performed with breed-specific effects. Moderate heritability estimates were found for average daily gain (0.23), kidney fat weight (0.19), carcass length (0.15), shoulder width (0.33), subcutaneous fat thickness (0.22), and cutlet area (0.36). While heritability for cooking loss was found to be low (0.07), shear force (0.17) and dressing percentage (0.20) showed moderate heritability, and thus might be candidate traits to be included in the selection index in the population. In general, low phenotypic and low or moderate genetic correlations were detected between the traits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".