MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792531034 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-12699

Segment Routing Green Spine Switch Management System for DCN

2018· dissertation· en· W2792531034 on OpenAlexaff
Ose Osamudiamen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData centerEnergy consumptionComputer networkRouting (electronic design automation)Computer scienceBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is without a doubt that the data center is the core of most IT industries, providing services to billions of users today.The preferred data center network (DCN) architecture used for this platform is the 2-tier leaf-spine topology, which is not only energy efficient but has a good performance metrics.Furthermore, due to the exponential increase of information and services from datacenters, it is projected that a 14.1 zeta bits of bandwidth would be needed to meet the current demands of data by the end of 2020 in USA data centers alone.This would require a tremendous amount of energy to run those data centers.Hence, in recent years there is more focus on reducing the energy consumption in a data center.In trying to reduce the energy consumption of a data center, this thesis approaches the problem by utilizing Segment Routing-Traffic Engineering, and other power algorithms for an efficient DCN.The proposed approach makes it possible to deactivate spine switches and links on the data center networks, which results in energy savings.Our experimental results yielded an approximate of 80% in energy savings of the spine switches consumption whilst maintaining an average similar traffic performance.First, and foremost, I would like to acknowledge, my supervisor Prof Chung-Horng Lung of Carleton University, for giving the opportunity to carry out this thesis work.He became not only an academic supervisor, but a resourceful help, and beacon of hope to complete my research work.I want to acknowledge Mr Busuyi, he became an uncle where I needed one, an elderly friend.His constant help are still invaluable to

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207