Реализация лексической единицы North в канадских произведениях (на материале романов Ф. Моуэта)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article deals with problems of realization of the dictionary meanings, the word-formative and phrase forming potential of the lexeme «north» in Canadian author’s (Farley Mowat) novels. On the basis of dictionary definitions and texts, she analyzes the linguistic surrounding of the lexeme «north». The author reveals more frequent and less current derivatives of the lexeme «north». More frequent derivatives of the lexeme north are the following: northern, northward, northwest and less current are northeast, northlands and others. Farley Mowat’s novels contain high percentage of different words, phrases and word combinations that are related to definite cognitive aspect (direction, cardinal point 94%) and less presented cognitive aspects (lying in the northern part of the earth 5%, northern citizen 1%). The author reconstructs presentations of north in the Canadian language consciousness on the basis of text fragments. Hence, the lexeme north is widely spread in Canadian author’s novels (has high word-formative and phrase forming potential adding more definitions to those that were fixed in the dictionaries).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".