Mycoparasitism against sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is widespread within the genus trichoderma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One hundred twenty-six isolates of Trichoderma spp., belonging to the fungal collection of the Department of Tree Science, Entomology and Plant Pathology “Giovanni Scaramuzzi”, University of Pisa, were screened for their mycoparasitic ability against sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Isolates belong to the Pachybasium, Longibrachiatum, and Trichoderma Sections and included T. asperellum, T. atroviride, T. aureoviride, T. crassum, T. effusum, T. erinaceum, T. fasciculatum, T. flavofuscum, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. helicum, T. koningii, T. minutisporum, T. oblongisporum, T. polysporum, T. rossicum, T. saturnisporum, T. sinensis, T. stromaticum, T. velutinum, T. virens, T. viride, Hypocrea hunua and Trichoderma sp. An isolate of Clonostachys rosea was also tested. Some species were represented by only one strain. Mycoparasitic activity was expressed according to the percentage of decayed or infected sclerotia. Distribution of mycoparasitic ability according to the taxonomic position of Trichoderma spp. isolates was evaluated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".