A Visual Approach for Interactive Keyterm-Based Clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The keyterm-based approach is arguably intuitive for users to direct text-clustering processes and adapt results to various applications in text analysis. Its way of markedly influencing the results, for instance, by expressing important terms in relevance order, requires little knowledge of the algorithm and has predictable effect, speeding up the task. This article first presents a text-clustering algorithm that can easily be extended into an interactive algorithm. We evaluate its performance against state-of-the-art clustering algorithms in unsupervised mode. Next, we propose three interactive versions of the algorithm based on keyterm labeling, document labeling, and hybrid labeling. We then demonstrate that keyterm labeling is more effective than document labeling in text clustering. Finally, we propose a visual approach to support the keyterm-based version of the algorithm. Visualizations are provided for the whole collection as well as for detailed views of document and cluster relationships. We show the effectiveness and flexibility of our framework, Vis-Kt , by presenting typical clustering cases on real text document collections. A user study is also reported that reveals overwhelmingly positive acceptance toward keyterm-based clustering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it