MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792649174 · doi:10.1111/tra.12553

The chaperone Chs7 forms a stable complex with Chs3 and promotes its activity at the cell surface

2018· article· en· W2792649174 on OpenAlexafffund
Sai Tejasvi Dharwada, Lauren E. Dalton, Björn D. M. Bean, Nirmala Padmanabhan, Catherine Choi, Cayetana Schluter, Michael Davey, Elizabeth Conibear

Bibliographic record

VenueTraffic · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsEndoplasmic reticulumChaperone (clinical)Cell biologyBiologyIntracellularYeastCytosolProtein foldingSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCell membraneChitin synthaseCellBiochemistryChitinEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The polytopic yeast protein Chs3 (chitin synthase III) relies on a dedicated membrane-localized chaperone, Chs7, for its folding and expression at the cell surface. In the absence of Chs7, Chs3 forms high molecular weight aggregates and is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Chs7 was reported to be an ER resident protein, but its role in Chs3 folding and transport was not well characterized. Here, we show that Chs7 itself exits the ER and localizes with Chs3 at the bud neck and intracellular compartments. We identified mutations in the Chs7 C-terminal cytosolic domain that do not affect its chaperone function, but cause it to dissociate from Chs3 at a post-ER transport step. Mutations that prevent the continued association of Chs7 with Chs3 do not block delivery of Chs3 to the cell surface, but dramatically reduce its catalytic activity. This suggests that Chs7 engages in functionally distinct interactions with Chs3 to first promote its folding and ER exit, and subsequently to regulate its activity at the plasma membrane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrafficSame topicFungal and yeast genetics researchFrench-language works237,207