MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Milan, 1535–1706

2015· reference-entry· en· W2792659779 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
S. D’Amico

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2015
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNobilityFeudalismPoliticsEconomic historyPopulationEmpirePolitical scienceHistoryEarly modern periodGeographyEconomyAncient historyDemographySociologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Milan represented one of the main European economic and political centers throughout the late medieval and Renaissance period. The city’s enormous wealth lay on the rich agriculture of its hinterland, on its role as entrepôt between Italy and northern Europe, and on its celebrated manufactures. At the end of the 16th century, with a population of over 120,000 people, Milan ranked as the fourth largest European city. Since 1535, and until 1706, the Lombard capital also played a fundamental strategic role within the Spanish Empire, and between the 16th and 17th centuries was at the forefront of the Catholic Reformation under Carlo and Federico Borromeo. Despite its economic, political, and religious importance, however, Milan remains the least studied of the major Early Modern European cities. The origins of this historiographical neglect can be partially found in the negative connotation that has characterized the period of Spanish rule over the peninsula since the Italian Risorgimento, epitomized by the great novel I promessi sposi (The betrothed) (1827) by Alessandro Manzoni. The 17th century in particular was perceived as a period of general crisis that marked the political, economic, and cultural decline of Italy, and especially of the Spanish provinces. The Spanish Empire came in fact to represent a symbol of oppression, responsible for spreading feudalism, corruption, and conformity. Milan, as portrayed by Manzoni, was a city characterized by disease, poverty, riots, an oppressive nobility, and rapacious Spanish officials, and would epitomize for generations of Italians a dark age of their history. Besides paying the price of this anti-spagnolismo (anti-Spanish sentiment), Milan was also penalized by the bombings of the Second World War that ended with the destruction of a significant part of the city’s archival sources. With the exception of a few earlier isolated works, it is only in the 1980s that historians have shown signs of a renewed interest for the history of Milan in the 16th and 17th centuries, and only since the 1990s has the historiography of Early Modern Milan flourished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1020.052

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207