MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2792692179 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.079

A79 FECAL SHORT CHAIN FATTY ACID COMPOSITION IN CROHN’S DISEASE PATIENTS CONSUMING A DIVERSIFIED COMPARED TO NON-DIVERSIFIED DIET

2018· article· en· W2792692179 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maitreyi Raman, Lorian Taylor, Remo Panaccione, Subrata Ghosh, Raylene A. Reimer, Nusrat Shommu, Richard Fedorak, Karen Madsen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesCalprotectinInternal medicineMedicineFood groupButyrateGastroenterologyShort-chain fatty acidDietary diversityCrohn's diseaseEtiologyColonoscopyDiseaseMicrobiomeInflammatory bowel diseaseFood scienceBiologyColorectal cancerEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with Crohn’s Disease (CD) are at increased risk of nutritional deficiencies that are multifactorial in etiology, and may include poor dietary diversity. Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) are known to have anti-inflammatory properties. Nutrition status and dietary diversity have been shown to impact the gut microbiome, however the effect of dietary diversity on fecal SCFA composition in CD is understudied. (1) To describe the baseline fecal SCFA profiles in patients with CD in remission who consume a diversified diet (DD) compared to patients who consume a non-diversified diet (NDD); (2) To describe the changes in fecal SCFA in patients with CD in remission who consume a NDD following a 3-month dietary intervention. Patients with CD were recruited prospectively at the University of Calgary. All patients were in remission as confirmed by ileo-colonoscopy within 6 months of study entry and normal fecal calprotectin levels. A NDD was defined as fewer than 3 daily servings of fruits and vegetables, dietary fiber ≤ 15g/day, red meat intake ≥ 3 weekly servings. Patients recorded dietary intake using a 3-day food record that was analyzed by the study Registered Dietitian. Patients consuming a NDD were provided a personalized dietary intervention by the RD for 3 months to improve dietary diversity and maintained weekly food diaries to assess compliance. SCFA were measured in stool samples at baseline and after 3 months by gas chromatography. Twenty participants were recruited (14 DD, females: n=11; 6 NDD, females: n=4). Compared with the CD group consuming a DD group at baseline, CD patients consuming a NDD had lower levels of fecal propionate (µmol/ml) (1.56 ± 0.59 vs 2.35 ± 0.18; p=0.08), lower levels of iso-butyrate (0.12 ± 0.05 vs 0.24 ± 0.02; p=0.03), and iso-valeric acid (0.15 ± 0.06 vs 0.36 ± 0.04; p=0.01). Following a 3-month dietary intervention, a significant increase in fecal propionate was observed from baseline to 3-months (1.56 ± 0.59 vs. 2.06 ± 0.55; p <0.05) with trends towards increased acetate (7.46 ± 0.6 to 9.57 ± 1.2; p=0.06) and iso-butyrate (0.12 ± 0.05 to 0.25 ± 0.08; p=0.07). In the NDD group, non-significant increases in fecal acetate and propionate were observed from baseline to 3 months. CD patients consuming a non-diversified diet have reduced levels of fecal SCFA compared with patients consuming a more diversified diet. We have demonstrated that initiation of a structured dietary intervention to enhance dietary diversity will significantly increase fecal SCFA (propionate) levels. Clinical studies are underway to document the efficacy effects of this intervention. Broad Foundation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→