MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792717300 · doi:10.1109/twc.2018.2808952

Multipair Two-Way Half-Duplex DF Relaying With Massive Arrays and Imperfect CSI

2018· article· en· W2792717300 on OpenAlex
Chuili Kong, Caijun Zhong, Michail Matthaiou, Emil Björnson, Zhaoyang Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Science and Technology Major ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Integrated Services NetworksQueen's UniversityQueen's University Belfast
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceTransmitter power outputImperfectChannel (broadcasting)Mathematical optimizationRelay channelTopology (electrical circuits)Power (physics)Sequence (biology)Spectral efficiencyTelecommunicationsMathematicsCombinatoricsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers a two-way half-duplex decode-and-forward relaying system, where multiple pairs of single-antenna users exchange information via a multiple-antenna relay. Assuming that the channel knowledge is nonideal and the relay employs maximum ratio processing, we derive a largescale approximation of the sum spectral efficiency (SE) that is tight when the number of relay antennas M becomes very large. Furthermore, we study how the transmit power scales with M to maintain a desired SE. In particular, three special powerscaling cases are discussed and the corresponding asymptotic SE is deduced with clear insights. Our elegant power-scaling laws reveal a tradeoff between the transmit powers of the user/relay and pilot symbol. Finally, we formulate a power allocation problem in terms of maximizing the sum SE and obtain a local optimum by solving a sequence of geometric programming problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it