MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 351: The Family Study: Assessment of the Risk for Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Family Members of Cardiac Arrest Patients

2013· article· en· W2792725666 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine S. Allan, Theresa Aves, Laurie J. Morrison, Jack V. Tu, Matthew P. Guttman, Paul Dorian

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSudden cardiac arrestSudden cardiac deathInternal medicineCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is devastating for the patient’s family, friends, and community. There is limited information on its identifiable familial predisposition. Objectives: To evaluate the familial risk pattern for SCA in family members of cases compared to age-and-sex matched control groups. Incidence of prior symptoms and SCA triggers were also compared. Methods: We used a prospectively collected, population-based registry of all out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in the Greater Toronto Area, to identify cases from 2010-2012. Cases were defined as SCA patients aged 18-65 who arrested from a cardiac cause and were treated by Emergency Medical Services. Two relatives per patient were interviewed regarding symptoms prior to the arrest, cardiac history and family history of SCA. Control patients with known coronary heart disease (CHD) and healthy participants were recruited from PCI procedures and the Family Practice Units at St. Michael’s Hospital. Results: Complete family and medical history was obtained for 66 SCA cases, 56 heart disease patients and 27 healthy controls. Underlying diseases were CHD in 77%, non-CHD structural heart disease in 9%, primary arrhythmic in 3% and presumed cardiac of unknown etiology in 11%. A higher proportion of SCA individuals had a family history of SCA in 1st degree relatives (19/66; 28.8%) than 1st degree relatives of healthy controls (2/27; 7%; p=0.006) and 1st degree relatives of patients with heart disease (14/56; 25%) (Table 1). Among families with SCA, 3/66 (4.5%) had a history of >1 relative with SCA, vs. none in either control group. Most SCA patients experienced one or more warning symptoms in the hour preceding an arrest (40/66; 61%); 24/66 (36%) experienced a cardiac arrest during or following exercise. Conclusion: Family members of SCA patients have a higher SCA prevalence than family members of healthy controls. A high proportion of SCA patients experienced symptoms in the hour preceding their arrest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→