MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792811499 · doi:10.1002/jmri.26013

Novel connectivity map normalization procedure for improved quantitative investigation of structural thalamic connectivity in temporal lobe epilepsy patients

2018· article· en· W2792811499 on OpenAlexaff
Brendan Santyr, Jonathan C. Lau, Seyed M. Mirsattari, Jorge G. Burneo, Sandrine de Ribaupierre, David A. Steven, Andrew G. Parrent, Keith W. MacDougall, Ali R. Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporal lobeDiffusion MRITractographyParahippocampal gyrusThalamusEpilepsyNormalization (sociology)NeuroscienceMedicineNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingPsychologyRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Connectivity studies targeting the thalamus have revealed patterns of atrophy and deafferentiation in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The thalamus can be parcellated using probabilistic tractography to demonstrate regions of cortical connectivity; however, sensitivity to smaller or less connected regions is low. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate thalamic structural connectivity in a wider range of cortical and limbic structures in TLE patients using a novel connectivity map normalization procedure. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION/SUBJECTS: Patients (N = 23) with medication-resistant TLE and 34 healthy age-matched controls. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: mapping balanced steady-state free precession was used. Images were acquired at 3T. ASSESSMENT: Probabilistic tractography and a novel normalization procedure allowed comparison of groups with respect to thalamic connected volume, quantitative MRI, and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics. STATISTICAL TESTS: Independent samples t-test, Cohen's d, and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Following normalization, significant differences in thalamic connected volumes were found in left TLE vs. controls bilaterally within the posterior parahippocampal gyrus (L: P = 0.007, confidence interval [CI]: [173.306,1044.41], effect size [ES] = 1.072; R: P = 0.017, CI: [98.677,947.653], ES = 0.945), and contralaterally in the anterior temporal neocortex (P = 0.01, CI: (-2348.09, -333.719), ES = -1.021). This procedure revealed differences in thalamic connected volumes, where previously published procedures could not, and provided a basis for exploratory analysis of quantitative MRI and DTI metrics. DATA CONCLUSION: The novel connectivity map normalization scheme proposed here successfully allowed comparison between a wider range of cortical and limbic structures. Multiple volumetric and quantitative MRI and DTI-related differences between TLE patients and controls were revealed following normalization. With validation from a larger cohort, thalamo-temporal connection aberrancies may become useful biomarkers of disease states and probabilistic tractography as a procedure for identification of thalamic targets in modulatory therapies for TLE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:1529-1539.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207