MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2792812251 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2018.2791858

A Tool for Analysis and Calibration of Compact Polarimetry SAR Mode Anomaly

2018· article· en· W2792812251 on OpenAlexaff
Ramin Sabry

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarimetrySynthetic aperture radarCalibrationRemote sensingPolarization (electrochemistry)Mode (computer interface)Side looking airborne radarComputer scienceRadarPhysicsRadar imagingOpticsBistatic radarGeologyScatteringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmit wave polarization (i.e., ellipticity and roll) deviation from the ideal or intended transmit mode affects compact polarimetry (CP) products and associated data exploitation. Hence, it is important to evaluate such effects on the CP model and account for the associated variations through data exploitations. This letter explores an approach to model and estimate ellipticity variations for calibration by taking advantage of a variational model and adjoint polarimetric synthetic aperture radar data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing LettersSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207