MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Chlorite and Chlorate ion variability IN DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

2002· article· en· W2792813945 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hélène Baribeau, Michèle Prévost, R. L. Desjardins, Pierre Lafrance, Donald J. Gates

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlorateChlorine dioxideChloriteChlorineChemistryResidence time (fluid dynamics)Environmental chemistryInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogyMaterials scienceGeologyMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study tracked changes in chlorite ion (ClO2–) and chlorate ion (ClO3–) concentrations in the distribution system of the City of Laval, Québec, following use of chlorine dioxide (ClO2) or free chlorine. Water was collected in small‐ and large‐diameter pipes with respect to the residence time of each sampling point. In the network fed by a treatment plant using ClO2 in postdisinfection, ClO2– concentrations decreased with increasing water residence time. In the networks fed by treatment plants using free chlorine in postdisinfection, ClO2– levels remained below the method detection limit (MDL). ClO3– concentrations measured in the network following ClO2 postdisinfection were found to be either below the MDL or stable at a low level (0.09 mg/L) in cold water; ClO3– levels decreased slightly in warm water with increasing residence time. In the networks using free chlorine as a postdisinfectant, ClO3– levels showed significant variations in their overall concentrations during different samplings or with specific changes in their concentration related to residence time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicChemical Analysis and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207